Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ernesto Escobedo vs Gijs Brouwer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Escobedo vs Brouwer analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On This Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Ernesto Escobedo vs Gijs Brouwer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Escobedo 0 - 0 Brouwer
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Escobedo has won 57.46% of points on their second serve, while Brouwer has won 50.86%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Escobedo, in recent form, has won 54.42% of their opponent's second serve points, while Brouwer has won 49.91%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.03% and 28.85% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Escobedo has saved 62.09% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Brouwer has saved 62.21% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Escobedo has won 56.9% of matches played (W/L 33/ 25), with Brouwer winning 49.25% (W/L 33/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Escobedo has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 241/ 158), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 38/ 46). Brouwer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 91/ 55), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 82/ 69).
- Player level: In the last year, Escobedo has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.13% of matches (W/L 17/ 15), where as Brouwer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.28% of matches (W/L 20/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Escobedo has played against opponents with an average rank of 214.07 while Brouwer has played against players with an average rank of 217.46.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Escobedo has won 37% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Brouwer has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Escobedo has converted 42.4% of breakpoint opportunities, and Brouwer has converted 33.99% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
454
Rank
67
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
189
Rank
114
High
28
Age
L
Plays
Form
57% (321-244)
Career Total W/L
58% (319-233)
58% (21-15)
YTD W/L
54% (22-19)
$909,628
Career Prize Money
$285,240
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Ernesto Escobedo vs Gijs Brouwer For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Escobedo VS Brouwer
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ernesto Escobedo | Gijs Brouwer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (21/15) | 54% (22/19) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (48/35) | 51% (47/45) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (419/354) | 51% (459/438) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (15/9) | 50% (5/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 14% (1/6) | 55% (6/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (5/0) | 44% (4/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 64% (7/4) |
| Aces pg | 0.36 | 0.41 |
| Aces Total | 135 | 180 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.13 |
| DFs Total | 69 | 55 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:25 | 1:31:56 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 231.25 | 267.9 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1353/2131) | 69% (1941/2825) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (982/1353) | 69% (1347/1941) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 57% (447/778) | 52% (456/884) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (92/217) | 36% (99/275) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (868/2188) | 38% (1091/2887) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 60% (9/6) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 53% (9/8) | 52% (13/12) |
| Futures W/L | 80% (12/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (21/36) | 54% (22/41) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 21% (3/14) |
| Deciding Set W% | 45% (5/11) | 70% (7/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (24/18) | 90% (21/19) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (24/6) | 10% (21/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (12/3) | 15% (20/3) |
Ernesto Escobedo Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Ernesto Escobedo
Player
Mitchell Krueger
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ernesto Escobedo
Player
Matt Kuhar
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ernesto Escobedo
Player
Joshua Sheehy
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
12
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
3
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
32 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Ernesto Escobedo
48%
(
40 of
83)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
37 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
83
|
1-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ernesto Escobedo
Player
Chad Kissell
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
46%
(
27 of
59)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Ernesto Escobedo
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
55%
(
56 of
101)
13
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
94
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ernesto Escobedo
Player
Nicolas Mejia
52%
(
48 of
92)
1st Serve %
55%
(
56 of
102)
2
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
3
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
64%
(
28 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
12 of
46)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
35 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
102)
107
Total Points Won
87
|
6-7(4) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ernesto Escobedo
Player
Andre Ilagan
59%
(
61 of
103)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
8
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
34 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
25 of
77)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ernesto Escobedo
Player
Alexander Frusina
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Trevor Svajda
Player
Ernesto Escobedo
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
25 of
30)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Gijs Brouwer Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Christian Langmo
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabio Fognini
Player
Gijs Brouwer
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
77%
(
65 of
84)
10
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
1
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
20 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
27 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Constant Lestienne
Player
Gijs Brouwer
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
4
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Gijs Brouwer
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
73%
(
68 of
93)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
44 of
68)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Adrian Mannarino
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Jakub Mensik
71%
(
64 of
90)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
6
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
8
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
33 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Cristian Garin
79%
(
79 of
100)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
97)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
2
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
6
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
16 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
24 of
79)
89
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zachary Svajda
Player
Gijs Brouwer
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
74%
(
64 of
87)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
89
|
6-1 1-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Escobedo Vs Brouwer Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Escobedo are available here and Brouwer photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Ernesto Escobedo
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Gijs Brouwer
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
